PROLOGUE: Since the academic standard for excellence rises the further you apply yourself, rules for these standards are monitored not only by the supervising professor, but also the entire institution. Cheating in an institutionalized university is against those rules and standards applied.
CONTRARY: Conditions that lead to cheating can range from desperation, ambition, all the way to obstinacy. In all of these instances, the students acting on their own will to lie their way though a course.
EXPOSITION: However, on a larger scale, the ramifications of one person cheating is grave towards the whole institution. The entire goal of the institution is to provide the best education to the student, and by them cheating, it not only deprives the institution of their ability to give education, but the student to receive it.
COMPARISON: A cheater is a horrible thing to be, who condones the willful act against the rules of the institution they abide by, and agreed to when joining.
INTENTION: Those who intentionally cheat decide this for themselves, and by doing this, prove their intent to the instructor as well as the institution.
DIGRESSION: A person who cheats knowingly is guilty. If they did not knowingly commit a wrongful dead, then they may be excused from their act.
REJECTION OF PITY: Cheating hurts everyone. It hurts those who are not even in college yet. Children in grade school will be effected by every cheaters action, and because of that, the evolution of their education is directly impacted by a cheater today.
LEGALITY: It is never been customary for people to cheer on the person who goes behinds others backs. It should follow that it is right to punish those who do so.
ADVANTAGE: The benefits for those who punish the wrong doers will be lofty, as they not only rid themselves of the cheater, but they also provide themselves with the moral obligations of punishing them.
POSSIBILITY: It would definitely be easy to punish those who cheat. Perhaps it should be better if it is left in the hands of a higher authority rather than the individual teacher.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)